GAO Report critical of anthrax vaccine.
October 23, 2002
The 1998 Defense Department anthrax vaccine policy that required military personnel to be vaccinated against their will has had serious fall out. First, far greater health related problems resulted than had been acknowledged until now, and, we learn, that policy has led experienced pilots to leave the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard.
The General Accounting Office issued a report following its survey of these military units. The survey was conducted at the request of Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman of the House Government Reform Committee.
“The GAO estimated that about 37 percent of the service members surveyed had received one or more anthrax shots as of September 2000. Of those, 85 percent reported experiencing some sort of reaction, far higher than the 30 percent claimed by the vaccine manufacturer. ”
Cong. Burton said: “The Defense Department needs to do a better job giving accurate information to our military personnel so they can make informed decisions.”
Dr. Meryl Nass noted the importance of maintaining follow up records of those who are vaccinated: “This report is very important as it calls into question the Air Force’s readiness to conduct war if mandatory vaccinations are used on all service members. It also exposes the lie by General Weaver/DOD that anthrax vaccine did not affect the attrition rate of pilots. It further notes the critical need to perform active surveillance on military members following vaccination, since military culture works against spontaneous reporting of adverse effects. Therefore inquiring of every vaccinated soldier whether reactions occurred afterward is crucial to learning how many are affected and with which illnesses or symptoms.”
ANTHRAX VACCINE CITED IN LEAVING MILITARY
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Some Left Military Over Anthrax
By SUZANNE GAMBOA
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP)–Highly trained and experienced pilots and crews in the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve are leaving or have left military service in part because of the Pentagon’s anthrax vaccine, congressional investigators say in a report released Tuesday.
Randomly selected guard and reserve troops surveyed in 2000 by the General Accounting Office also reported adverse reactions to the vaccine at double the rate claimed by the manufacturer, BioPort Corp., the GAO said.
Military members who have left represent some of the most experienced and highly trained individuals in the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve "and are people not easily replaced,” the GAO said.
"While many factors can and do influence an individual’s decision to participate in the military, a significant number of pilot and air crew members cited the required mandatory anthrax immunization as a key reason for reducing their participation or leaving the military altogether in 2000,” the GAO said.
The GAO recommended that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld require a surveillance program to monitor problems with the vaccine. The program should ensure complete and appropriate treatment and follow-up for those who experience problems or who may have them in the future, the auditors said.
In a response included with the report, the Defense Department disagreed with the GAO’s recommendation and some of its findings. Reginald J. Brown, assistant secretary of the Army, cited a National Academy of Sceinces report that concluded there was no data that pointed to the need for a monitoring program. Brown also said the GAO’s findings on rates of separation by pilots were not supported by data from the Defense Manpower Data Center and the GAO did not consider normal turnover rates.
The GAO mailed 1,253 surveys in May 2000 and received 843 responses, with 833 providing useful information. The surveys were developed with the help of pilots and other aircrew members of the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve.
The survey was conducted at the request of Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman of the House Government Reform Committee.
"Anthrax is a serious threat that our soldiers might face on the battlefield. At the same time, this vaccine has been controversial, and it has caused serious reactions in some individuals,” Burton said in a news release.
Anthrax is an acute infectious disease caused by spore-forming bacteria. Five people were killed in last year’s anthrax attacks by mail. It is considered to be a possible biological weapon that could be used against U.S. troops.
Hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops have received vaccines to protect them against anthrax, particularly during the Persian Gulf War. After a long pause in the inoculation program, the pace of vaccinations was accelerated last month, officials said. Some veterans and researchers believe the vaccine is partly responsible for illnesses reported by Gulf War veterans.
According to the GAO survey, between September 1998 and September 2000, about 16 percent of guard and reserve pilots and air crew had moved to inactive status, left the military or transferred to another unit–mostly nonflying positions to avoid or delay receiving anthrax shots.
About 18 percent of those in or assigned to a unit indicated they planed to leave in the near future. The GAO said both groups ranked the anthrax vaccine as a key factor in their decision.
About 45 percent said they would consider returning if the anthrax immunization were voluntary.
The GAO estimated that about 37 percent of the service members surveyed had received one or more anthrax shots as of September 2000. Of those, 85 percent reported experiencing some sort of reaction, far higher than the 30 percent claimed by the vaccine manufacturer.
Each shot generated an average of four or more reported reactions, some that could have negative effects on the service member’s job, the GAO said.
The GAO said it found two DOD studies of the vaccine, one in Korea and one in Hawaii, that reported similar reaction rates.
On the Net:
General Accounting Office: http://www.gao.gov
FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.