Alliance for Human Research Protection
AHRP Honors Exemplary Professionals
Fred Baughman, MD
Fred A. Baughman, Jr.
Carl Elliott, MD
Carl Elliott, MD
Curt D. Furberg, MD
Curt D. Furberg, MD
David Graham, MD
David Graham, MD
Diane Harper, MD
Diane Harper, MD
Bernadine Healy, MD
Bernadine Healy, MD
Anthony Morris, MD
Anthony Morris, MD
Loren Mosher, MD
Loren Mosher, MD
Florence Nightingale
Florence Nightingale
Nancy Olivieri, MD
Nancy Olivieri, MD
Maurice Pappworth, MD
Maurice Pappworth
John Pesando, MD
John Pesando, MD
Jacob Puliyel, MD
Jacob Puliyel, MD
John Thompson, MD
John Thompson, MD
Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Board of Directors
    • Honor Roll–Exemplary Professionals
    • Contact
    • Subscribe to the AHRP Mailing List
    • Donate
  • Categories
    • Eugenics / Bioethics
    • Medicalized Racism
    • Immoral Experiments
    • Exploited Populations
      • Children
      • Soldiers
    • Clinical Trials
    • Corrupt Practices
    • Safety Hazards
    • Children Victimized
  • Medical Ethics
    • Nuremberg Code
    • Informed Consent
    • Research Integrity
    • Conflict of Interest
  • Medical Atrocities
    • Before Nuremberg
    • Nazi Medical Atrocities
    • Japanese Medical Atrocities
    • U.S. Cold War Experiments
      • Operation Paperclip
      • US Soldiers-GuineaPigs
      • Radiation Experiments
    • CIA-Mind Control
    • Torture Experiments
    • WWII Updates
  • Current Controversies
    • Unethical Experiments
    • Concealed Data
    • Informed Consent Waivers
    • Vaccine mandates
  • Vaccines
    • Unsafe Vaccines
    • Vaccine mandates
    • Wakefield Controversy

Dr Hans Swering President

Published August 20, 2015 at 278 × 181 in 1939–1945: Medicalized Mass Murder, Children first

Image navigation

← Previous Pic Next Pic →

Donate to AHRP

To make a tax-deductible contribution, you may use Paypal:


Or mail your check, payable to AHRP:

Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
142 West End Ave., Suite 28P
New York, NY 10023

Random Quote

Peer review is supposed to be the quality assurance system for science, weeding out the scientifically unreliable and reassuring readers of journals that they can trust what they are reading. In reality, however, it is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.

— Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ
Proudly powered by WordPress


Copyright © 2019 Alliance for Human Research Protection. All Rights Reserved.