Alliance for Human Research Protection

AHRP Honors Exemplary Professionals

Fred Baughman, MD

Fred A. Baughman, Jr.

Carl Elliott, MD

Carl Elliott, MD

Curt D. Furberg, MD

Curt D. Furberg, MD

David Graham, MD

David Graham, MD

Diane Harper, MD

Diane Harper, MD

Bernadine Healy, MD

Bernadine Healy, MD

Anthony Morris, MD

Anthony Morris, MD

Loren Mosher, MD

Loren Mosher, MD

Florence Nightingale

Florence Nightingale

Nancy Olivieri, MD

Nancy Olivieri, MD

Maurice Pappworth, MD

Maurice Pappworth

John Pesando, MD

John Pesando, MD

Jacob Puliyel, MD

Jacob Puliyel, MD

John Thompson, MD

John Thompson, MD

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Primary Menu

Skip to content

About
Categories
Medical Ethics
Medical Atrocities
Current Controversies
Vaccines
- Unsafe Vaccines
- Vaccine mandates

Stanford

1997 U.S. Government Experiments Violate Ethical Research Standards

August 1, 2015 |

The Declaration of Helsinki defines ethical research: “In any medical study, every patient – including those of a control group, if any – should be assured of the best proven diagnostic and therapeutic method.” (1964; 1996) That standard for ethical research was . . . Continue reading →

Categorized Unethical Experiments | Tagged Stanford, Government placebo-HIV experiments, Africa, psychiatric drug experiment, teenage prisoners

Stanford University to Ban Free Lunch but Not Consultancies

September 12, 2006 |

Stanford University announced that it is adopting a strict conflicts of interest policy. Continue reading →

Categorized Conflict of Interest, Pharma Corrupt Influence | Tagged conflict of interest, Academia, Mercury, Harvard, Stanford

Harvard / Stanford–Psychiatrists’ Financial Ties to Industry

July 11, 2006 |

Two probing first rate investigative reports document how psychiatry’s treatments are shaped by "opinion leaders" whose professional recommendations are compromised by their substantial, largely undisclosed, financial ties to drug companies. Continue reading →

Categorized Doctors/ Researchers | Tagged conflict of interest, Academia, FDA, Bi-Polar, killing, Peer Review, GlaxoSmithKline, Mercury, Infants, psychosis, CME, Hypertension, Psychiatry, Harvard, Stanford, Merck, ACNP, SSRI, The Wall Street Journal, Eli Lilly, NEJM, JAMA, diabetes, Psychotropic Drugs, Serotonin, Paxil, Pfizer

Aid Our Efforts: Donate!

Make a tax-deductible contribution today.

Sign up for our Newsletter.

Receive email updates from AHRP.

Donate to AHRP

To make a tax-deductible contribution, you may use Paypal:

Or mail your check, payable to AHRP:

Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
142 West End Ave., Suite 28P
New York, NY 10023

Random Quote

Peer review is supposed to be the quality assurance system for science, weeding out the scientifically unreliable and reassuring readers of journals that they can trust what they are reading. In reality, however, it is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.

— Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ

Proudly powered by WordPress

Copyright © 2019 Alliance for Human Research Protection. All Rights Reserved.