Reporters Find Science Journals Harder to Trust, but Not Easy to Verify–NY Times
"My antennae are definitely up since the whole thing unfolded," acknowledged Rob Stein, science reporter of The Washington Post.
"My antennae are definitely up since the whole thing unfolded," acknowledged Rob Stein, science reporter of The Washington Post.
It is no longer possible not to notice the lack of medical justification for current psychotropic drug prescribing practices.
"This is out-of-control use of drugs that have profound cardiovascular consequences. We have got a potential public health crisis. I think patients and families need to be made aware of these concerns."
"During a hastily called press conference yesterday,” the FDA announced that it is considering ADDITIONAL warnings on the labels of SSRI drugs—Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, et al.
Children have been dying from exposure to psychostimulant drugs as the FDA looked the other way:
"Sham peer review," in medicine is not "only" affecting the integrity of
medical journals and the scientific literature,
It is astonishing how untrustworthy loosely given advice about the safety of SSRI antidepressants by medical professionals and academic institutions.
An independent review by a team of German analysts published in the American Journal of Psychiatry confirms that corporate bias is ubiquitous in clinical trials.
Benedict Carey of The New York Times reports with a degree of healthy skepticism about the latest scientific hoopla: Neuroscientists’ infatuation with brain imaging techniques.
"Soon, intuition and the personal experience of friends and family may seem as trustworthy as advice from a doctor in diagnosing an illness or judging a treatment."
"modern pharmacological treatment may be no more beneficial than older ones, despite their added cost."