Skip to content
Alliance for Human Research Protection

Alliance for Human Research Protection

Facebook X
  • Home
  • AboutExpand
    • Board of Directors
    • Distinguished Advisory Board
    • Honor Roll–Exemplary Professionals
  • Video
  • Support
  • Contact
  • Medical EthicsExpand
    • First, do no Harm
    • Human Rights
    • Informed Consent
    • Nuremberg Code
  • Eugenics / BioethicsExpand
    • Discrimination
    • Medicalized Racism
    • Gene Modification
    • Depopulation
  • Corrupted ScienceExpand
    • Scientism
    • Technocracy
    • Bias/Fraud
    • Propaganda – Censorship
    • Clinical Trials
    • Concealed Data
    • Public-Private Partnerships
    • Pharma Corrupt Influence
    • Publication Bias
  • Medical AtrocitiesExpand
    • Organ Harvesting
    • Bioweapon Experiments
    • Transhumanism
    • Current Medical Atrocities
    • Japanese Atrocities
    • Nazi Atrocities
    • Operation Paperclip
    • CIA Mind-Control
    • CIA Torture
    • U.S. Radiation Experiments
    • Unethical Experiments
  • Current ControversiesExpand
    • Pandemic Control
    • Great Reset
    • Digital Id
    • Apartheid Policies
    • Covid Pandemic
    • Epidemics
    • Government Overreach
  • VaccinesExpand
    • Vaccine Profit Engine
    • Child Sacrifice
    • Vaccine Mandates
    • Vaccine Risks
    • Vaccine Safety
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Facebook X

Author: Vera Sharav

  • CIA Torture

    2001: U.S. DOJ “legalizes” non-consensual human experiments; DOD waives informed consent

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    Nov. 2001: U.S. Department of Justice “legalizes” nonconsensual experiments Experimenting on prisoners of war is explicitly prohibited by the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Conventions and U.S. law (18 USC section 1430). The Pentagon sought to lift these prohibitions on research involving prisoners. Lawyers in the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office…

    Read More 2001: U.S. DOJ “legalizes” non-consensual human experiments; DOD waives informed consentContinue

  • CIA Torture | Partners in Torture | Psychology

    Malignant roots & precursors of U.S. post-September 11, 2001 Torture

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    CIA torture techniques in use since Sept. 11, 2001 – are euphemistically called “enhanced interrogation techniques”(EIT). They were touted as “science-based;” they are the product of decades of unethical experiments by American psychiatrists and psychologists who explored the psychological effects of extreme stress. A. CIA’s infamous mind control experiments: BLUEBIRD,…

    Read More Malignant roots & precursors of U.S. post-September 11, 2001 TortureContinue

  • CIA Torture

    After 9/11, the CIA adopts reverse-engineered “SERE” interrogation protocol

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    After September 11, 2001, the C.I.A. ignored its own 1989 conclusions that torture is not an effective way to elicit intelligence information, and embarked on widespread use of torture globally, employing the euphemistic term, “enhanced interrogation techniques” (EIT). America’s post-9/11 torture techniques are an expansion of the mind control arsenal…

    Read More After 9/11, the CIA adopts reverse-engineered “SERE” interrogation protocolContinue

  • CIA Torture

    False assumptions, professional ignorance led to bad decisions

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    The primary argument that officials in the Bush administration made in defense of their authorization for the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” (EIT) — otherwise recognized as torture — is that their use in interrogations of Al Qaeda suspects resulted in obtaining vital intelligence information that “saved American lives.” That…

    Read More False assumptions, professional ignorance led to bad decisionsContinue

  • CIA Torture

    2001 – 2007: Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel redefined the parameters of torture

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    The Office of Legal Counsel was established to serve as the “constitutional conscience” of the Justice Department: “OLC is, and views itself as, the frontline institution responsible for ensuring that the executive branch charged with executing the law is itself bound by law. The danger, of course, is that OLC…

    Read More 2001 – 2007: Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel redefined the parameters of tortureContinue

  • CIA Torture

    Dec. 2001: American Psychological Association Collusion Facilitates the use of Torture

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    In December 2001, a small group of professors and law enforcement and intelligence officers gathered outside Philadelphia at the home of a prominent psychologist, Martin E. P. Seligman, to brainstorm about Muslim extremism. Seligman is most famous for his work in the 1960s in which he was able to psychologically…

    Read More Dec. 2001: American Psychological Association Collusion Facilitates the use of TortureContinue

  • CIA Torture

    Feb. 2, 2002: Executive Decree Denies Al Qaeda detainees Geneva POW Protection

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

     Al Qaeda were labelled “unlawful enemy combatants.” President Bush effectively denied prisoners in the War on Terror the legal protections and minimum standards for humane treatment under Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. He did so while stating that, as a matter of policy, the U.S. Armed Forces shall treat…

    Read More Feb. 2, 2002: Executive Decree Denies Al Qaeda detainees Geneva POW ProtectionContinue

  • CIA Torture | Partners in Torture | Professional Fraud / Misconduct | Psychology

    2002: The Torture Business proved highly profitable as a business

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    The CIA and the Department of Justice were the lead government agencies that authorized the use of torture techniques against prisoners in the War against Terror. The CIA contracted psychologists to devise and supervise tough innovative interrogation techniques whose use would have arguable “scientific and psychological” justification. James Mitchell and Bruce…

    Read More 2002: The Torture Business proved highly profitable as a businessContinue

  • CIA Torture

    Feb. 2002: President Bush Executive Order authorizes interrogation expeiments

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    Feb. 2002: President Bush Executive Order authorizes JTF-170 GTMO Intelligence Corps. Guantanamo Bay Detention Center opens (Jan. 2002) and is almost immediately transformed into a “Battle Lab” – the term used to describe the intelligence operation by Commander MG Dunlavey and later MG Miller – where prisoners are subjected to…

    Read More Feb. 2002: President Bush Executive Order authorizes interrogation expeimentsContinue

  • CIA Torture

    The claimed effectiveness of torture to obtain intelligence is shown to be a fabricated lie

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    Katherine Eban, in her extraordinary report Rorscharch and Awe in Vanity Fair (2007), unmasked the fabricated lie crediting torture as the key to successful interrogations. In fact, it was the F.B.I.’s humane treatment and rapport-building techniques that prompted of Abu Zubaydah to divulge actionable information. But this success story evaporated…

    Read More The claimed effectiveness of torture to obtain intelligence is shown to be a fabricated lieContinue

  • CIA Torture

    March 2002: Abu Zubayadah, the first “high value” detainee & first tortured guinea pig

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    Abu Zubaydah was described as al-Qaeda’s coordinator of attacks who helped manage an Al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan. He was detained at a “black site” in Thailand and first interrogated from March to June 2002, by two seasoned FBI agents, Ali Soufan and Steve Gaudin, who spoke English and…

    Read More March 2002: Abu Zubayadah, the first “high value” detainee & first tortured guinea pigContinue

  • CIA Torture

    Seasoned professionals within the administration opposed use of torture

    March 28, 2015May 4, 2016

    The Senate Armed Services Committee Report (2009) shows that in memos to the Office of Legal Counsel in both the Justice Department and Defense Department, senior officials in the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) openly referred to torture: “the memo did not purport to address the ‘myriad legal, ethical or moral implications…

    Read More Seasoned professionals within the administration opposed use of tortureContinue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 28 29 30 31 32 … 212 Next PageNext
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Donate
Facebook X

© 2025 Alliance for Human Research Protection

  • Home
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Distinguished Advisory Board
    • Honor Role-Exemplary Professionals
  • Video
  • Support
  • Contact
  • All Articles
    • Medical Research Ethics
      • First, do no Harm
      • Human Rights
      • Informed Consent
      • Nuremberg Code
    • Eugenics / Bioethics
      • Discrimination
      • Medicalized Racism
      • Gene Modification
      • Depopulation
    • Corrupted Science
      • Scientism
      • Technocracy
      • Bias/Fraud
      • Propaganda — Censorship
      • Clinical Trials
      • Concealed Data
      • Public-Private Partnerships
      • Pharma Corrupt Influence
      • Publication Bias
    • Medical Atrocities
      • Organ Haversting
      • Bioweapon Experiments
      • Transhumanism
      • Current Medical Atrocities
      • Japanese Medical Atrocities
      • Nazi Medical Atrocities
      • Operation Paperclip
      • CIA Mind-Control
      • CIA Torture
      • U.S. Radiation Experiments
      • Unethical Experiments
    • Current Controversies
      • Pandemic Control
      • Great Reset
      • Digital ID
      • Apartheid Policies
      • Covid Pandemic
      • Epidemics
      • Government Overreach
    • Vaccine Controversies
      • Vaccine Profit Engine
      • Child Sacrifice
      • Vaccine mandates
      • Vaccine Risks
      • Vaccine Safety
Search