Skip to content
Alliance for Human Research Protection

Alliance for Human Research Protection

Facebook X
  • Home
  • AboutExpand
    • Board of Directors
    • Distinguished Advisory Board
    • Honor Roll–Exemplary Professionals
  • Video
  • Support
  • Contact
  • Medical EthicsExpand
    • First, do no Harm
    • Human Rights
    • Informed Consent
    • Nuremberg Code
  • Eugenics / BioethicsExpand
    • Discrimination
    • Medicalized Racism
    • Gene Modification
    • Depopulation
  • Corrupted ScienceExpand
    • Scientism
    • Technocracy
    • Bias/Fraud
    • Propaganda – Censorship
    • Clinical Trials
    • Concealed Data
    • Public-Private Partnerships
    • Pharma Corrupt Influence
    • Publication Bias
  • Medical AtrocitiesExpand
    • Organ Harvesting
    • Bioweapon Experiments
    • Transhumanism
    • Current Medical Atrocities
    • Japanese Atrocities
    • Nazi Atrocities
    • Operation Paperclip
    • CIA Mind-Control
    • CIA Torture
    • U.S. Radiation Experiments
    • Unethical Experiments
  • Current ControversiesExpand
    • Pandemic Control
    • Great Reset
    • Digital Id
    • Apartheid Policies
    • Covid Pandemic
    • Epidemics
    • Government Overreach
  • VaccinesExpand
    • Vaccine Profit Engine
    • Child Sacrifice
    • Vaccine Mandates
    • Vaccine Risks
    • Vaccine Safety
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Facebook X

OHRP

  • Miscellaneous

    Do the Ends Justify the Means in Human Research?

    September 4, 2002November 21, 2014

    Do the Ends Justify the Means in Human Research? Thu, 5 Sep 2002 A moral struggle is taking place in which research stakeholders–including medical institutions that profit from biomedical research, and their emissaries in government oversight agencies–argue that ethics should be breached to further the interest of research. Patients’ rights…

    Read More Do the Ends Justify the Means in Human Research?Continue

  • AHRP Speaks Out

    AHRP Replies to OHRP Response re Surrogate Consent (ARDS Study)

    September 4, 2002November 21, 2014

    Thank you for your considered response to our July 29 letter to the director of the Office of Human Research Protection.

    We are astonished to learn that OHRP found that all 12 major research institutions involved in this multi-site trial had violated Federal protections (45 CFR 46.117):

    (a) "in all cases OHRP found that the informed consent documents approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) for the research failed to describe adequately the reasonably foreseeable risks and discomforts of the research."

    Read More AHRP Replies to OHRP Response re Surrogate Consent (ARDS Study)Continue

  • AHRP Speaks Out

    “Precursors to Diabetes in Japanese American Youth”

    August 21, 2002November 21, 2014

    Comments Re: DHHS Notice of Proposed Recommendation Regarding Support of Research Protocol: "Precursors to Diabetes in Japanese American Youth" Grant Number I R01 DK59234-01

    The proposed experiment would involve 450 children healthy children, aged 8-10 years old, 300 of Japanese ancestry and 150 Caucasians. The experiment is not approvable under federal regulations, 45 CFR 46 Subpart D because it involves greater than minimal risk and no potential direct benefit to the children.

    Read More “Precursors to Diabetes in Japanese American Youth”Continue

  • Miscellaneous

    AHRP Letter of complaint to Dr. Greg Koski

    July 29, 2002November 21, 2014

    THE ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP) New York, NY 10023 212-595-8974 July 29, 2002 Greg Koski, MD, Ph.D. Office of the Secretary Office of Public Health and Science Office of Human Research Protection The Tower Building 1101 Wooten Parkway, Suite 200 Rockville, MD 20852 RELATED PAGES OHRP Investigation of…

    Read More AHRP Letter of complaint to Dr. Greg KoskiContinue

  • Unethical Experiments

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome – ARDSNet experiment criticized – OHRP

    July 29, 2002September 17, 2021

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome – ARDSNet experiment criticized – OHRP Fri, 28 Feb 2003 An Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) study conducted between 1996 and 1999, on critically ill patients at 20 medical facilities (14 major research centers belonging to the ARDS Network), was published in The New England Journal…

    Read More Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome – ARDSNet experiment criticized – OHRPContinue

  • Miscellaneous

    High Mortality Rates in Clinical Trials

    July 29, 2002November 21, 2014

    High Mortality Rates in Clinical Trials Mon, 4 Nov 2002 Serious concerns are being raised about the high death rate in clinical trials. According to several articles in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the lives of critically ill patients have been put at increased risk due…

    Read More High Mortality Rates in Clinical TrialsContinue

  • Miscellaneous

    Article

    May 21, 2002November 21, 2014

    Why did OHRP SHRED informed consent documents? Sat, 25 Oct 2003 China Daily’s premier medical correspondent, XIONG LEI, raises embarrassing questions that should trouble Americans, not just the bioethics and research community. She makes a plea for justice for some 200,000 Chinese farmers who were used in 12 genetic experiments…

    Read More ArticleContinue

  • Miscellaneous

    Harvard research in China: Open Letter to Pres. Summers

    May 15, 2002November 21, 2014

    Harvard research in China: Open Letter to Pres. Summers Sat, 12 Apr 2003 On May 15, 2002, The Boston Globe reported that Lawrence Summers, the President of Harvard University, “expressed deep regret that a dozen Harvard-run genetic studies in China failed to give test subjects adequate information about potential pitfalls.”…

    Read More Harvard research in China: Open Letter to Pres. SummersContinue

  • Miscellaneous

    Dissenting Opinion – Proposed Children’s Workgroup Reinterpretation of Fed Regs 45 CFR 46 sects. 404 & 406

    May 14, 2002November 21, 2014

    Dissenting Opinion (NHRPAC Children Workgroup) re: Proposed Reinterpretation of Fed. Regs Protecting Children (45 CFR 46, sections 404 and 406) May 14, 2002 To: Alan Fleischman, MD, Chair, Children’s Workgroup of NARPAC        Mary Faith Marshall, Ph.D., Chair, NARPAC From: Vera Hassner Sharav Re: Dissenting Opinion re: Report to NHRPAC, proposing…

    Read More Dissenting Opinion – Proposed Children’s Workgroup Reinterpretation of Fed Regs 45 CFR 46 sects. 404 & 406Continue

  • Presentations by AHRP/Board Members

    Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Trials

    May 7, 2002November 21, 2014

    Presented by Vera Hassner Sharav
    14th Tri-Service Clinical Investigation Symposium
    Sponsored by The U.S. Army Medical Department and The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancment of Military Medicine

    The cornerstone of public trust in medical research is the integrity of academic institutions and the expectation that universities, which rely on public funding, have a responsibility to serve the public good. Financial conflicts of interest affect millions of American people – those who are subjects of clinical trials testing new drugs and those who are prescribed drugs after their approval.

    Read More Conflicts of Interest in Clinical TrialsContinue

  • Miscellaneous

    Sharav Presentation before US Army Medical Dept., May 6, 2002

    May 5, 2002November 21, 2014

    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Presented by Vera Hassner Sharav 14th TRI-SERVICE CLINICAL INVESTIGATION SYMPOSIUM Sponsored By THE U.S. ARMY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT And THE HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE May 5-7, 2002 The cornerstone of public trust in medical research is the integrity of academic institutions and…

    Read More Sharav Presentation before US Army Medical Dept., May 6, 2002Continue

  • Miscellaneous

    InfoMail for April 29, 2002

    April 29, 2002November 21, 2014

      AHRP InfoMail Return to Home Page Return to InfoMail Media Coverage List MediaCoverage News Stories on Human ResearchProtection andCommentary by Vera Hassner Sharav April 29, 2002 China Daily: Harvard Project ViolatesFarmers’ Rights FYI American experiments on impoverished populations inunderdeveloped countries needs much more oversight than seems to have beenprovided. XIONG…

    Read More InfoMail for April 29, 2002Continue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 Next PageNext
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Donate
Facebook X

© 2025 Alliance for Human Research Protection

  • Home
  • About
    • Board of Directors
    • Distinguished Advisory Board
    • Honor Role-Exemplary Professionals
  • Video
  • Support
  • Contact
  • All Articles
    • Medical Research Ethics
      • First, do no Harm
      • Human Rights
      • Informed Consent
      • Nuremberg Code
    • Eugenics / Bioethics
      • Discrimination
      • Medicalized Racism
      • Gene Modification
      • Depopulation
    • Corrupted Science
      • Scientism
      • Technocracy
      • Bias/Fraud
      • Propaganda — Censorship
      • Clinical Trials
      • Concealed Data
      • Public-Private Partnerships
      • Pharma Corrupt Influence
      • Publication Bias
    • Medical Atrocities
      • Organ Haversting
      • Bioweapon Experiments
      • Transhumanism
      • Current Medical Atrocities
      • Japanese Medical Atrocities
      • Nazi Medical Atrocities
      • Operation Paperclip
      • CIA Mind-Control
      • CIA Torture
      • U.S. Radiation Experiments
      • Unethical Experiments
    • Current Controversies
      • Pandemic Control
      • Great Reset
      • Digital ID
      • Apartheid Policies
      • Covid Pandemic
      • Epidemics
      • Government Overreach
    • Vaccine Controversies
      • Vaccine Profit Engine
      • Child Sacrifice
      • Vaccine mandates
      • Vaccine Risks
      • Vaccine Safety
Search