
Similar Posts
Who is a Human Subject? Who has the Right to Informed Consent?
"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."
[Nuremberg Code, 1947]
"Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information. [ Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46.102 (f)]
On October 30, 2001, the National Human Research Protection Advisory Committee (NHRPAC) signed off on recommendations redefining the term "human subject" in an effort to accommodate research that invades people’s privacy by declaring that "human subjects" are only those "who interact personally with research investigators."

To Obey or Not Obey with Holocaust Survivor Vera Sharav
Vera Sharav is a Holocaust survivor and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection. She’s spent decades advocating for ethical medical standards and individual rights. Known for her outspoken views on public health, Vera has been deemed controversial for comparing the Holocaust with the global response to the COVID-19…

Doctors’ Trial: Never Forget
Some thoughts on the Nuremberg Code’s 75th anniversary by Ash, a Student of History… >> Go to Nuremberg75.com to get a free copy of The Nuremberg Code – Commemorative Edition << The post was cross-posted at Bailiwick News Doctors’ Trial: Never Forget For the past nine months I’ve been pseudonymously serializing…
Response to Washington Post Editorial “Missing Drug Data”
Today’s (6/30/04) editorial, “Missing Drug Data,” misses the point and argues with the pharmaceutical industry and its allies in the Congress, the NIH and the FDA that data can be selectively reported to satisfy commercial interests. This is a blatant attack on Karl Popper’s falsifiability principle on which empirical science depends to make progress. One needs all the data in order to verify the results of clinical or any other kind of research. Most academics and pundits know that any case can be made if allowed to manipulate the data and assumptions. The AMA, the medical journal editors, and Eliot Spitzer, all deserve applause from the Washington Post editor-not quibbling about the possible damage that somehow, somewhere might result from strict embrace of the principles and practice of scientific inquiry. It’s all about transparency.
John H. Noble, Jr.
AHRP Press Release Re: Maryland Court of Appeals Decision
AHRP Alliance for Human Research Protection AHRP Speaks Out Return to Home PageAHRP Speaks Out Press ReleasesOctober 29, 2001 FYI Widely disparate perspectives are presented in an article in the Maryland Daily Record re: The Court of Appeals of Maryland decision (Gimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Aug 16, 2001). That…
Vera Sharav: A Profile in Nature Biotechnology
Dr. Marcia Angell, a senior lecturer at Harvard Medical School, and former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine and author of The Truth About Drug Companies, describes Sharav as an extraordinarily observant and valuable critic. "I see her as someone the research establishment badly needs."