Carl Elliott, MD

Primary Menu

About
Categories
Medical Ethics
Medical Atrocities
Current Controversies
Vaccines

Racialized Science

“Racialized Science” Racial Selection of U.S. Soldiers

November 8, 2015 |

“Racialized science” is the misuse of scientific techniques to support racist hypotheses which are then used as a pretext to justify racism and discrimination “One aspect of the chemical warfare research program on mustard gas involved race-based human experimentation. In at least . . . Continue reading →

Categorized Guinea Pig soldiers, Racialized Science

Aid Our Efforts: Donate!

Make a tax-deductible contribution today.

Sign up for our Newsletter.

Receive email updates from AHRP.

AHRP Board Member's Recent Posts, Testimonies, Publications

06. 2019. Truth in Research Labelling, John H. Noble Jr., Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

04. 2019. Missing, hidden and destroyed adverse event data. Who vaccinates?, Meryl Nass, MD

03. 2019. Whither Cochrane?, Meryl Nass, MD and John H. Noble Jr., Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

03. 2019. A sample of vaccine and injectable medication tragedies in the US during my lifetime, Meryl Nass, MD

03. 2019. The Skinny on Pertussis, Vaccines and Enforced Mandates, Meryl Nass, MD

03. 2019. My testimony on vaccine exemptions to the Maine joint Education and Cultural Affairs Committee, Meryl Nass, MD

03. 2019. Indisputable: CDC is not making prudent vaccine recommendations, Meryl Nass, MD

03. 2019. OP-ED: Why Americans don’t trust vaccine makers, Meryl Nass, MD, Bangor Daily News, also posted here.

01. 2019. Expert witness David Egilman wins billions—and makes enemies—as he fights companies over public health, David Egilman, MD, Science Magazine

01. 2019. Challenging The Promotion Of Antidepressants For Non-Severe Depression, John H. Noble Jr., Alain Braillon, and Joel Lexchin, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia

01. 2019. Measles: Two U.S. Outbreaks are Blamed on Low Vaccination Rates, Another Perspective, Meryl Nass, MD, British Medical Journal, also posted here.

07. 2018. J&J seeks retraction of papercritical of Pinnaclehip study, David Egilman, MD, MassDevice.com

07. 2018. Artificial Hip Maker Demands Retraction Of A Paper Calling Its Research ‘Grave Fraudulence’, David Egilman, MD, STAT News

02. 2018. How effective are Flu Shots? CDC says its an (optimistic) 40%, Meryl Nass, MD

02. 2018. Re: Doctor Who Linked Thimerosal to Autism Wins Damages From Maryland Medical Board for Harrassing and Humiliating Him, Meryl Nass, MD

02. 2018. Can it be? Study finds that college students who had been vaccinated against flu were more likely to excrete flu virus / Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, Meryl Nass, MD

01. 2018. Court Records Show How a Medical Device ‘Seeding Trial’ Disguised Marketing as Science, David Egilman, MD, Health News Review

01. 2018. Meningococcal Vaccine is a Scam -- but you may forfeit an education if you refuse, Meryl Nass, MD

01. 2018. Grave fraudulence in medical device research: a narrative review of the PIN seeding study for the Pinnacle hip system, Joan E. Steffen, B.A., Ella A. Fassler, B.S., Kevin J. Reardon , M.A., and David S. Egilman, M.D., M.P.H. Accountability in Research

11. 2017. Sudden Shift at a Public HealthJournal Leaves ScientistsFeeling Censored, David Egilman, MD, ProPublica

05. 2017. Letter Submitted to New England Journal of Medicine re ARDS Investigation, John H. Noble Jr. and Vera Hassner Sharav

03. 2017. Should Research Ethics Committees Police Reporting Bias? Rapid Response (Fourth Comment), John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal, comment also posted here

02. 2017. A Need To Stand United: Reply To The WAME Secretary, John H. Noble Jr., Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

01. 2017. Corporate Corruption of Science—AnotherAsbestos Example, David Egilman, MD, American Journal of Industrial Medicine

09. 2016. ''Trust The Researchers'': Flying In The Face Of Evidence, John H. Noble Jr., Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

05. 2016. ‘YOU WANT A DESCRIPTION OF HELL?’ OXYCONTIN’S 12-HOUR PROBLEM, David Egilman, MD, Los Angeles Times

05. 2016. Peeling The Onion From The Inside Out, John H. Noble Jr., Indian Journal of Medical Ethics

05. 2015. Re: FDA Disagrees With BMJ Study That Found Clinical Trials Were Not Being Reported, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

05. 2015. Re: Comparative Effectiveness Of Exercise And Drug Interventions On Mortality Outcomes: Metaepidemiological Study, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

05. 2015. Re: Evidence Based Medicine: A Movement In Crisis, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

05. 2015. Re: US Researchers Failed To Disclose Risks Of Newborn Study, Finds Government Office, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

05. 2015. Re: Research Misconduct Is Widespread And Harms Patients, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

05. 2015. Re: Should Research Fraud Be A Crime?, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

01. 2012. The Emperor Is Marching Around Buck Naked, John H. Noble Jr., British Medical Journal

02. 2011. Medical Ethics and Contemporary Medicine: Mandatory Vaccination: An Inversion Of Medical Ethics And Human Rights, Vera Hassner Sharav, Ed. Louise Kuo Habakus, and Mary Holland, JD, Vaccine Epidemic

03. 2009. Speculation Does Not Constitute Scientific Evidence, Vera Hassner Sharav, PLoS Medicine

Donate to AHRP

To make a tax-deductible contribution, you may use Paypal:

Or mail your check, payable to AHRP:

Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
142 West End Ave., Suite 28P
New York, NY 10023

Random Quote

Peer review is supposed to be the quality assurance system for science, weeding out the scientifically unreliable and reassuring readers of journals that they can trust what they are reading. In reality, however, it is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.

— Richard Smith, former editor of the BMJ