
Similar Posts
Conflicts of Interest Undermine Safety for Human Subjects
Widely disparate perspectives are presented in an article in the Maryland Daily Record re: The Court of Appeals of Maryland decision (Gimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Aug 16, 2001). That 6-to-1 landmark decision severely criticized the practice of exposing healthy children to risks of harm in health related research. Children, we must bear in mind, are powerless to exercise that inviolable human right, the right to refuse to assume risks for research.
Will this decision undermine the legitimacy of research that puts healthy children at risk in clinical trials? AHRP believes it will, and that the decision will be sustained by other courts in other states.
- AHRP Speaks Out | Business of Medicine | Children at Risk | Children Victimized | Clinical Trials | Concealed Risks | Corporate-Corrupted Medicine | Current Controversies | Current Medical Atrocities | First, do no Harm | Global Public Health Institutions | Government Overreach | Honest Science | Informed Consent | Involuntary Treatment | Medical Ethics - Human Rights | Medical Research Ethics | Newsflash | Nuremberg Code | Presentations by AHRP/Board Members | Presentations of Interest | Publication Integrity | Research Integrity | Vaccine Controversies | Vaccine mandates | Vaccine Risks | Vaccine Safety | Vulnerable Groups
Join Robert F Kennedy Jr. – April 19 in Boston
Dear Supporter of Freedom, Autonomy and the Right to Voluntary Informed Consent! Please join me on Wednesday, April 19 in Boston for an historic event: Robert F Kennedy Jr. will announce his candidacy for President of the United of America at the Boston Park Plaza. The most important way you can help…
Letter Submitted to New England Journal of Medicine re ARDS Investigation
The April 3, 2003 New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) issue contained an array of articles largely in support of a disputed multi-site, clinical trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), involving critically-ill, mentally incapacitated human beings with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) – who did not give their informed consent.
The accompanying editorial, "Controlling Research Trials," by Dr. J.M. Drazen, who serves on the NHLBI advisory committee that had approved the disputed trial, reveals much about the NIH attitude toward the rest of the world.
- AHRP Speaks Out | Bioweapon Experiments | Corrupted Science | Covid Pandemic | Current Controversies | Medical Atrocities | Research Integrity | Vaccine Controversies
Part 5. COVID Vaccines: The Chicken or the Egg? (From “The WHO’s Proposed Treaty Will Increase Man-Made Pandemics”)
Part 5. COVID Vaccines: The Chicken or the Egg? The health authorities could have just been ignorant—that could possibly explain the first few months of the COVID vaccines’ rollout. But once they figured out, and even announced in August 2021 that vaccines did not prevent catching COVID or transmitting it,…
Never Again is Now Global: Gaza Genocide Updated
Dear Truth Seekers, T.S. Eliot, in his epic poem, The Waste Land, turned the natural cycle of death and rebirth on its head, declaring: “April is the Cruelest Month”. April happens to be the month I was born … but also, the month in which my beloved husband died in 2020….
2005: IOM Committee Considers Return to Prison Research
Today’s New York Times Magazine cover story, Planet of the Retired Chimpanzees By Charles Siebert, reports that chimpanzees who have served as subjects in biomedical research can look forward to being set free in one of 12 specially built chimp sanctuaries the prettiest places in all of Florida. This is…