The WHO’s Proposed Treaty Will Increase Man-Made Pandemics
is an in-depth analysis by Meryl Nass, MD.
The analysis focuses on the man-made Covid debacle and the planned, centralized, tightly controlled New World Order. Dr. Nass lays out the detailed evidence about the dangers posed. An alarming aspect of the WHO Draft Treaty – which no one has noted – is that the WHO incentivizes the development and proliferation of biological weapons. and the evisceration of our national sovereignty and personal freedom, bodily autonomy, and civil, legal and human rights.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has assumed the authority to “health emergencies” and “pandemics.” These declared, but not necessarily real health emergencies, have been weaponized to facilitate a power grab by a band of globalists who finance the WHO. Their objective is to eviscerate our national sovereignty and personal freedom, bodily autonomy, and civil, legal and human rights.
If the Draft Treaty of the World Health Organization is ratified, the entire global population would be subjected to the dictates of the Director General of the WHO. Every vestige of personal freedom, legal rights, human rights, and bodily autonomy would be forfeited forever.
A band of unelected oligarchs are intent on gaining absolute control over the global resources by declaring global authority over public health – which serves a dual purpose. First, it serves to vastly enrich the pharmaceutical industry by mandating the global use of newly produced, patent-protected vaccines and drugs whose safety and efficacy has not been proven. Thus, manufacturers and public health officials are legally shielded from liability for harm.
By ceding authority to the WHO to declare a public health emergency and to dictate global mandates facilitates a totalitarian global nightmare in which every aspect of life will be subjected to dictates and controlled by means of 24-hour surveillance. This is the objective of the push toward a digital identity that will include all personal biometric data, including medical and vaccination record; and a record of educational, professional, political activities, and personal preferences.
A centrally controlled digital currency is a mechanism of control. The push toward one digital, global currency will eliminate our control over all business and personal financial transactions and expenditures. It will facilitate the impounding and expropriating our property and financial assets. A centrally controlled digital currency is the mechanism that Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum had in mind when he predicted in January 2020:
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” –
You will own nothing…” It’s useful to remember evil is often good at diagnosing problems (because it causes them), but its remedies are always far worse than the disease
If we are to preserve our human dignity – as free citizens – we must raise our voices and refuse to obey. Resist the WHO entrapment by exiting.
We post Dr. Nass’ lengthy analysis in ten segments following her ten headings:
Pt. I Weapons of Mass Destruction: Chem/Bio (below)
This report is designed to help readers think about some big topics: how to really prevent pandemics and biological warfare, how to assess proposals by the WHO and its members for responding to pandemics, and whether we can rely on our health officials to navigate these areas in ways that make sense and will help their populations.
We start with a history of biological arms control and rapidly move to the COVID pandemic, eventually arriving at plans to protect the future.
Pt.1: Weapons of Mass Destruction: Chem/Bio
Traditionally, the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) have been labelled Chemical, Biological, Radiologic, and Nuclear (CBRN).
The people of the world don’t want them used on us—for they are cheap ways to kill and maim large numbers of people quickly. And so international treaties were created to try to prevent their development (only in the later treaties) and use (in all the biological arms control treaties). First was the Geneva Protocol of 1925, following the use of poison gases and limited biological weapons in World War I, banning the use of biological and chemical weapons in war. The US and many nations signed it, but it took 50 years for the US to ratify it, and during those 50 years the US asserted it was not bound by the treaty.
The US used both biological and chemical weapons during those 50 years. The US almost certainly used biological weapons in the Korean War (see this, this, this and this) and perhaps used both in Vietnam, which experienced an odd outbreak of plague during the war. The use of napalm, white phosphorus, agent orange (with its dioxin excipient causing massive numbers of birth defects and other tragedies) and probably other chemical weapons like BZ(ahallucinogen/incapacitant) led to much pushback, especially since we had signed the Geneva Protocol and we were supposed to be a civilized nation.
In 1968 and 1969, two important books were published that had a great influence on the American psyche regarding our massive stockpiling and use of these agents. The first book, written by a young Seymour Hersh about the US chemical and biological warfare program, was titled Chemical and Biological Warfare; America’s Hidden Arsenal. In 1969 Congressman Richard D. McCarthy, a former newspaperman from Buffalo, NY wrote the book The Ultimate Folly: War by Pestilence, Asphyxiation and Defoliation about the US production and use of chemical and biological weapons. Prof. Matthew Meselson’s review of the book noted,
Our operation, “Flying Ranch Hand,” has sprayed anti-plant chemicals over an area almost the size of the state of Massachusetts, over 10 per cent of its cropland. “Ranch Hand” no longer has much to do with the official justification of preventing ambush. Rather, it has become a kind of environmental warfare, devastating vast tracts of forest in order to facilitate our aerial reconnaissance. Our use of “super tear gas” (it is also a powerful lung irritant) has escalated from the originally announced purpose of saving lives in “riot control-like situations” to the full-scale combat use of gas artillery shells, gas rockets and gas bombs to enhance the killing power of conventional high explosive and flame weapons. Fourteen million pounds have been used thus far, enough to cover all of Vietnam with a field effective concentration. Many nations, including some of our own allies have expressed the opinion that this kind of gas warfare violates the Geneva Protocol, a view shared by McCarthy.