The first duty of responsible, loving parents is to protect their children from harm. A parent’s duty to their children supersedes government decrees. Children’s lives and well-being should not be subjected to unjustifiable risk. Early in the pandemic, Professor Yoram Lass, MD, a former director general of the Ministry of Health, and former Associate Dean…

Read More

Vaccine Mandates Signify Failure to Persuade with Claims that Contradict the Evidence Mass Covid vaccination campaigns worldwide rely on the concealment of the growing body of evidence. The evidence contradicts the claimed safety, health benefits & protection from Infection. A US federal court rejected FDA’s refusal to disclose Pfizer’s report documenting Covid vaccine safety data.…

Read More

UPDATE 10/11/2020: The Great Barrington Declaration garnered more than 100,000 signatories by Oct. 8th, when Rddit and r/COVID-19 channel “moderators’ censored and removed the Declaration from their sites. Censorship of scientists reveals that genuine science and scientific discourse pose a major threat to those who exploit the COVID-19 Pandemic for political and financial self-interest. On October…

Read More

“I have no ideological grounds against Monsanto. For me it’s the scientific argument. They have not done a proper job of testing, and they are just using their political and economic muscle to foist it on us.”(Professor Arpad Putsztai, quoted in The Guardian, 2008) “Censorship of research into the risks of a technology so intertwined…

Read More

Politics and the perversion of science: In 2003, a congressional committee report, documented political interference and manipulation of scientific research at federal agencies charged with developing science-based public health policies. “The Administration’s political interference with science has led to misleading statements by the President, inaccurate responses to Congress, altered web sites, suppressed agency reports, erroneous…

Read More

Proponents of genetically engineered / modified (GE/GM, GMO) food often characterize the debate as one of science versus superstition. The implication is that those opposed to GE/GMOs are irrational anti-science cranks or they are misguided by religious ideas. In fact, most of the opposition to the use of GE in agriculture is based on scientists’…

Read More

The corruption of nutrition science goes back 50 years when the sugar industry bribed Harvard scientist Public health and nutrition policies that are claimed to be “science-based” are most often shaped by industry-paid academic scientists who deliver findings favorable to their corporate benefactors. “If, as seems increasingly likely, the nutritional advice on which we have…

Read More